Legal Insight
Force Majeure Still Turns on Words
Force-majeure disputes continue to center on clause text and evidentiary record quality. The controlling issue is typically whether performance was prevented within clause scope, not whether performance became less profitable or more difficult.
Key Legal Questions
- Does the triggering event fall inside the contract's defined force-majeure language?
- Did the event actually prevent performance rather than increase cost or inconvenience?
- Did the invoking party attempt reasonable mitigation and comply with notice requirements?
Practical Implications
Commercial parties should assume that courts will read force-majeure clauses narrowly and examine contemporaneous correspondence in detail. Clause drafting that defines events, notice timing, and mitigation expectations with precision tends to reduce litigation uncertainty.
Practical Steps
- Audit force-majeure language across active agreements and map it to operational notice procedures.
- Preserve mitigation evidence, including substitute vendor sourcing and partial performance proposals.
- Document any timeline showing when performance became impossible and what alternatives were attempted.